The film,
Collateral Murder, exposes some form of the truth about murders that occurred
in Iraq during the war and how horrible that event actually was. Though the
picture is shaky, and not always clear it’s understood by the audience that
this incident can’t be ruled an accident because of the lack of effort given to
find the truth by the soldiers. What stood out to me in the film wasn’t the
visuals but instead the audio. The way the soldiers approached the
situation seemed unprofessional and like they were eager to kill whatever came
in front of them. While the audience might be able to understand how it could
be an accident because the distance could make it hard to see, the audio is a
different story. The commentary gives the viewers the impression that the
soldiers didn’t really care of feel the need to find out who they were about to
attack. Comments made like, “Oh, yeah look at those dead bastards” and quoting
South Park makes the soldiers seem to be almost villainous and I think the
audio exposes more of the truth in this film or what seems to be the truth.
Although I believe the kills made as shown in the film weren’t just the video
is sort of deceptive because it doesn’t show what these soldiers went through
before and everything after. It only gives us a piece of a bigger story since
it doesn’t show the events that took place in that area earlier on and also we aren’t
shown how they handle every detail of the aftermath of the event. In war
everyone is fighting for what they believe is true, so how can we decide whose
reality is the actual truth?
In your opinion, do you think the credibility and truth of this documentary film are called into question by the way it chose to depict the events it did? Do you think it is the responsibility of a documentary to evenly explore both sides of the issue and present the material in a non-bias manner? I strongly believe that this documentary along with "The Unknown Known" enter into a sort of paradox. The documentaries enter into a topic under the assumption that the situations they are exploring are wrong, corrupt, untrue, etc. However, while in pursuit of depicting the situations in this manner they also compromise the truth and credibility of the documentary itself.
ReplyDelete