Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Assignment 3

I've chosen to look at The Royal Tenenbaums, specifically the mise en scene of the scene introducing Raleigh St. Clair (played by Bill Murray).  Raleigh is introduced after his wife, Margot of the Tenenbaum's, a chain-smoking playwriter who hides her true self from her husband and family.  She is an artist, which contrasts her husband, Raleigh, a scientific writer and neurologist.

I noticed aside from this scene, more generally, something about the film's characters.  There is sensible growth in the young and old versions of the Tenenbaum family.  After a few decades of screen absence, the kids believably aged linearly predictably. I mean to say that I think that the cute child actors greatly resemble their adult match. Each characters' simply effective dialogue movement points to their youth ties.  Every face in this film appears symmetrical, crisp and inviting.  The setting, uses aesthetic techniques like complementary coloring, symmetry, and depth. Here are a few of the shots:

Symmetry-Murray's head is framed.
Complimentary colors-Raleigh's purple undershirt, purple wall vs. boy's saturated yellow, dry yellow door.
Beige color theme to match old school props & costumes (phone, radio, tv, suit, glasses) & vintage soundtrack


Props are saturated like an eye-spy book, every figure is identifiable.


The wide frame creates tremendous depth perception for scenes with medium focus, allowing us to identify roughly every figure.  The narrow gap is subtle but between the arrows suggests about 10 ft of depth (tub and stool).  No camera movement or focus to stress the total mise en scene rather than a specific character or thing. 



  Mise en scene is the substance of cinema that the art aspect manipulates (through cinematography, sound, and editing).  Of course cinema has a narrative, and that narrative information sometimes isn't said, but can be seen in an actor or prop's presence or movement.  How the narrative is understood cognitively depends on elements of mise en scene. For instance, the impressions of different colors, items, clothes, facial expressions, and so on into days and days of preparing a set.


3 comments:

  1. I like the points you are making here, especially about symmetry. I think it is in the nature of humans to enjoy symmetrical things. There have been studies of people responding better physically to people who have symmetrical faces. I would like to know though, what does all of this mean in terms of the movie? What do you think was the point of all of these choices?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love your points on the aesthetic value of this movie directed by Wes Anderson. When I watched this movie, it feels very nice to my eyes the way everything is constructed. I am sure it did happen to everyone else as well even the person not paying much attention to the aesthetic part. I don't think he is trying to present some sort of message to the viewers in relation to the plot of this movie. I believe Wes Anderson is just a very detailed director who loves this approach of making everything looks so nice, symmetrical and also good color schemes in the movie he is directing. He directed another movie - The Budapest Hotel- that has the same nice element of symmetrical.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love your points on the aesthetic value of this movie directed by Wes Anderson. When I watched this movie, it feels very nice to my eyes the way everything is constructed. I am sure it did happen to everyone else as well even the person not paying much attention to the aesthetic part. I don't think he is trying to present some sort of message to the viewers in relation to the plot of this movie. I believe Wes Anderson is just a very detailed director who loves this approach of making everything looks so nice, symmetrical and also good color schemes in the movie he is directing. He directed another movie - The Budapest Hotel- that has the same nice element of symmetrical.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.